United States v. Daniels

by
Defendant appealed his sentence after revocation of supervised release. The court concluded that the district court committed plain error when it violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(b)(2)(E) when it did not affirmatively offer defendant an opportunity to speak before imposing its sentence. Accordingly, the court vacated and remanded for resentencing. View "United States v. Daniels" on Justia Law